NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    SBA criticizes EPA chemical assessments

    March 20, 2013

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Environmental Protection Agency draft exposure assessments on three chemicals and their use in small business settings did not rely on adequate data, according to a March 15 letter from the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy.

    As part of a plan to enhance EPA’s chemical management program, the agency is conducting assessments of 83 chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act. It recently released draft assessments on three of those chemicals and their use in small businesses:

    In the letter to EPA, SBA suggested the agency lacked accurate data and made false assumptions that employee exposure at small shops was less controlled and monitored than that at larger shops.

    Because the risk assessments will be used to direct activities within EPA’s Existing Chemicals Program (.pdf file) – which could include rulemakings – SBA stressed the importance of using an accurate model of small shop use and employee exposure and offered to put EPA in touch with small businesses that use the three chemicals.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.