NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Should employers' injury and illness data be made public?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today

    USFA releases residential building fire report

    May 2, 2012

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Emmitsburg, MD – From 2008 to 2010, fire departments responded to approximately 365,500 fires in residential buildings that caused an estimated 2,560 deaths, 13,000 injuries and $7.4 billion in property loss, according to a report (.pdf file) released April 26 by the U.S. Fire Administration.

    Cooking was the leading cause of fire in residential buildings, and most fires occurred in the early evening and during cooler months (peaking in January), the report stated.

    In related news, 70 percent of surveyed homeowners reported their houses were fully equipped with working smoke alarms, but full coverage was observed only in roughly 41 percent of these homes, indicates results of a study conducted by the John Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy in Baltimore.

    Most of the homeowners who overreported smoke alarm coverage assumed smoke alarms were working because they were mounted, or they failed to realize that working alarms must be present in attics and basements, according to the study abstract.

    Post a comment to this article

    Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy.