On Safety

The "On Safety" blog has been discontinued.

OSHA Roundup for Sept. 21, 2015

September 21, 2015
Reprints

News

OSHA updated its manual offering guidance on protecting the safety of emergency responders.

Notable proposed fines

$119,000 to an El Paso, TX-based stamping plant for a variety of violations, including amputation, machine guarding and personal protective equipment

$13,800 to a Houston recycling facility for a heat management program violation in connection to the heat-related death of a day laborer

$7,000 to a petroleum refinery facility in Norco, LA, for allegations that its failure to implement a heat management program contributed to the heat-related death of a pipefitter

$4,900 to a Pennsylvania-based steel erection company for a General Duty Clause violation due to employee exposure to heat stress conditions following one ironworker’s heat-related hospitalization

Happening this week

Sept. 14-Sept. 29 – Arkansas Amputation Prevention Stand-Down, sponsored by OSHA

Sept. 21 – National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health’s Temporary Workers Work Group meeting

Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of Sept. 21:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
 
81 Walking/Working Surfaces and Personal Fall Protection Systems (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "On Safety" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)