On Safety

The "On Safety" blog has been discontinued.

OSHA Roundup for Aug. 13, 2012

August 13, 2012
Reprints

News

Potential budget cuts to OSHA could result in more workplace deaths and injuries, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) suggests.

OSHA and NIOSH evaluate their efforts during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill cleanup.

OSHA is accepting nominations for its Maritime Advisory Committee for Occupational Safety and Health.

Notable proposed fines

$225,000 to a South Dakota manufacturing plant for citations that include failing to provide emergency exits and fall protection

$185,900 (.pdf file) to a New Hampshire foundry after a follow-up inspection found alleged lead hazards unabated

$173,500 to a general contractor and several subcontractors for alleged fall and electrical violations found at a New Hampshire shopping mall they worked on

$133,100 (.pdf file) to a Cleveland manufacturing plant for alleged violations related to a workplace amputation

$126,000 to a waste treatment facility in Ohio for alleged health violations and citations related to the process safety management of hazardous chemicals

$95,700 to a manufacturing facility in Ohio for alleged amputation violations

$94,500 in citations to a Birmingham, AL-based furniture manufacturer as part of its OSHA’s National Emphasis Program on amputations and its Local Emphasis Program on high noise industries

$82,500 in repeat and combustible dust-related citations, among others, to a Montana crop processor

Review counter

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

  • 546 days – Silica (proposed rule)
  • 265 days – Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
  • 47 days – Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)