NSC expo
Subscribe or Register
View Cart  

Earn recertification points from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals by taking a quiz about this issue.

What's Your Opinion?

Has an employer ever asked you to do something that violated your code of ethics as a safety professional?

Take the poll and add your comment.

Vote   Results

Get the news that's
important to you.

Sign up for Safety+Health’s free monthly newsletters on:

  • Construction
  • Health Care Workers
  • Manufacturing
  • Mining, Oil and Gas
  • Office Safety Tips
  • Transportation
  • Worker Health and Wellness
  • Subscribe today
    Federal agencies | Silica | Mining, oil and gas | Workplace exposures

    Perez defends OSHA, MSHA efforts during budget hearing

    March 26, 2014

    • / Print
    • Reprints
    • Text Size:
      A A

    Washington – Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez went before lawmakers March 26 and defended recent regulatory actions taken by OSHA and the Mine Safety and Health Administration.

    During a House Education and the Workforce Committee hearing on President Barack Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal for the Department of Labor, committee members questioned Perez on OSHA’s proposed rule on crystalline silica.

    Rep. Todd Rokita (R-IN) asserted that only about 70 percent of employers comply with the current standard, and asked why resources are not spent on compliance assistance efforts instead of a new rulemaking that could result in lower compliance rates.

    “It’s not an ‘either/or’ situation,” Perez responded, claiming that OSHA currently performs “significant” compliance assistance work.

    Earlier in the hearing, the secretary defended the silica proposal and the agency’s rulemaking effort, stating that concerns will be addressed in the final rule and he has “a lot of faith in the science” behind the rule.

    Likewise, Perez defended the Mine Safety and Health Administration’s process regarding the creation of a new coal dust rule, saying the process has been lengthy and inclusive.

    Much of the hearing focused on economic growth, job training and the minimum wage, and Perez said in his opening statement that employers have told him it is false to suggest job growth and job safety are mutually exclusive.