On Safety

The On Safety blog has moved.

OSHA Roundup for Oct. 6, 2014

October 6, 2014


Arizona stands by its assertion that its fall protection standard for construction is as effective as federal OSHA.

OSHA’s proposal to update its permissible exposure limits clears a regulatory hurdle.

Interested in obtaining free safety videos from OSHA? A new guide can tell you how.

The Federal Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health is scheduled to meet in November to discuss whistleblower protection.

Notable proposed fines

$162,000 to a Florida contractor for fall protection violations at two residential worksites

$136,290 to a New Jersey cabinetry company for allegations of exposing employees to chemical hazards

$89,500 to a steel foundry in Ohio for alleged machine hazards following a worker being pinned in a machine and suffering a broken back, collapsed lung and partial paralysis

$64,000 to an Ohio metal treating facility for confined space violations in connection to a metal door fatally striking a maintenance worker

$40,600 to a roofing contractor for fall protection violations related to a worker’s fatal fall at a Connecticut jobsite

Happening this week

Oct. 8-10 – Virginia Department of Labor and Industry’s annual Occupational Safety and Health Conference

Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of Oct. 6:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
32 Occupational Exposure to Beryllium (proposed rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "On Safety" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)