On Safety

The On Safety blog has moved.

OSHA Roundup for Aug. 26, 2013

August 26, 2013


A proposed silica rule, decades in the making, has been announced.

OSHA releases its Federal Annual Monitoring and Evaluation reports on State Plan states for fiscal year 2012.

A new CSB video urges OSHA to better regulate reactive chemicals.

Notable proposed fines

$317,000 to an Illinois fabricator for bypassing machine safeguards and failure to lock out, among other violations, in connection with the crushing death of a worker

$49,000 to a Texas corn mill for failing to provide an adequate emergency plan, train workers and provide a lifeline in connection with a worker’s asphyxiation caused by a grain engulfment

Happening this week

Aug. 26-29 – The 25th annual Alabama Governor’s Safety and Health Conference

Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of Aug. 26:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
643 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
425 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

Editor’s note: Because of Labor Day, OSHA Roundup will return Tuesday, Sept. 3. Have a happy and safe holiday weekend.

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)