On Safety

The On Safety blog has moved.

OSHA Roundup for Oct. 28, 2013

October 28, 2013


Two new OSHA web-based tools have been released to help employers who voluntarily wish to reduce hazardous chemicals in the workplace.

Source: OSHA issuance of a new electrical rule is “imminent.

OSHA extends the public comment period for its proposed silica rule.

Notable proposed fines

$280,800 to several contractors and subcontractors working at a New Hampshire power plant for alleged hazards that include cave-ins, falls and electrocution

$153,900 to a New Jersey concrete company for a variety of health violations, including confined space, respiratory protection and noise violations

$140,000 to a Wisconsin ethanol producer in connection with the grain engulfment death of a worker

$115,400 to a New Jersey steel company for failing to abate previous cited hazards related to a written lockout/tagout program, training workers on fire extinguishers and evaluating fork truck operator performance

Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of Oct. 28:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
706 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
488 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)