On Safety

The On Safety blog has moved.

OSHA Roundup for Dec. 3, 2012

December 3, 2012

Review counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

# of Days
658 Silica (proposed rule)
377 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
159 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.


The Office of Management and Budget has completed a review of Standards Improvement Project IV, a rule that would update and streamline several construction standards.

Several free OSHA guidance documents have been updated.

Notable proposed fines

$545,000 to an Ohio chemical facility in connection to the release of hazardous materials that led to a plant evacuation and closure of a nearby interstate

$165,900 to a Mississippi phosphate producer in connection to the deaths of two workers, both of whom were killed when struck by flying metal debris in separate incidents

$130,900 (.pdf file) to a warehouse company in New Jersey for allegations that include fall hazards and allowing workers to ride on forklifts

$118,000 to a New York bakery for alleged hazards such as inadequate machine guarding and a lack of lockout/tagout procedures

$77,000 to a Georgia chemical manufacturer in connection with a plant explosion

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)