On Safety

The On Safety blog has moved.

OSHA Roundup for March 18, 2013

March 18, 2013

Review counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

# of Days
763 Silica (proposed rule)
482 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
264 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

Notable proposed fines

$86,000 to an Ohio plastics plant that was also placed in OSHA’s Severe Violator Enforcement Program for alleged hazardous energy control violations

$73,150 to a masonry company in Pennsylvania for alleged fall hazards

$70,840 to a New Jersey-based contractor for alleged scaffolding and fall hazards

$65,800 to an Ohio manufacturing facility for guarding hazards that led to the amputation of a worker’s finger

$54,000 to a Montana-based asphalt company in connection with a worker’s fatal fall

$47,710 to New England Wood Pellet for alleged fire and combustible dust hazards at plants in Schuyler, NY, and Deposit, NY

$47,700 to a manufacturer for alleged airborne lead and other hazards at its Niagara Falls, NY, facility

Happening this week

March 18 – Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health meeting (.pdf file) on updating OSHA construction standards

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)