ATA pushes for hair samples as drug-testing alternative
Arlington, VA – The American Trucking Associations is calling for the federal government to release guidelines and standards regarding the use of hair samples as a drug-testing method for commercial motor vehicle drivers.
ATA President and CEO Chris Spear made the request March 20 in a letter sent to recently confirmed Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price. Congress required HHS to establish hair-testing guidelines by Dec. 4, 2016, but the agency missed the deadline and has yet to address the requirement.
Hair testing is an effective method to determine drug use among CMV drivers, ATA claims. Compared with urinalysis, hair testing is easier to collect, more difficult to manipulate and provides employers with a longer time frame to detect drug use, the organization states.
“Completion of this already overdue mandate will unlock tremendous safety benefits by providing trucking companies with the option to use hair testing as an alternative to urinalysis in meeting federal drug testing requirements,” Spear wrote to Price, who was confirmed Feb. 10. “[The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration] has long expressed an interest in recognizing hair testing as a federally accepted drug-testing method, but the lack of action is having real impacts on the industry.
“Many trucking companies are using urinalysis to meet federal requirements, while also paying the additional cost to conduct hair testing. We are frustrated that the previous administration failed to meet the statutory deadline and believe your leadership will finally see a resolution to this long-standing and important safety rule.”
Post a comment to this article
Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)