Federal agencies Worker health and wellness Transportation Transportation

Potential rule on sleep apnea yields strong praise, harsh criticism

Sleep apnea

Photo: Missouri Department of Transportation

Before moving forward on a proposed rule to study obstructive sleep apnea among truck drivers and railroad workers, government officials sought public comment on the issue.

The public did not hesitate to offer feedback: A total of 593 comments were submitted to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the Federal Railroad Administration. The comments included a wide range of viewpoints about whether the agencies should regulate the diagnosis and treatment of OSA for transportation workers in safety-sensitive positions.

Sleep apnea is a respiratory disorder that can cause frequent breathing interruptions during sleep. The condition affects 28 percent of commercial motor vehicle drivers, according to an FMCSA-sponsored study conducted by the University of Pennsylvania. It can lead to impairment or inattentiveness during waking hours if left untreated.

Many commenters agreed that fatigue is an important safety issue among transportation workers. However, they said it would be misguided to force drivers or carriers to pay for tests and treatment that can cost upwards of thousands of dollars. Others said FMCSA’s hours-of-service rules should be amended to allow drivers to stop and take naps without cutting into their on-duty time.

“This is junk science,” wrote William Henderson, of Brandon, FL. “You make the medical personnel force people to spend $2,500 to $4,000 just to [take] a test that no one passes. Total money maker.”

Kristoffer Flesland, of International Falls, MN, wrote that he had been diagnosed with sleep apnea and used a continuous positive airway pressure machine as part of his treatment.

“I am not against the federal government being involved in this, but my concern is how the doctors are making this quite profitable for them,” Flesland said. “Many insurances do not pay for this. ... Explain to me why commercial drivers are always in the cross fire?"

Some organizations said FMCSA and FRA needed to do a better job showing the specific need for action. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association stated that it opposes any requirements for screening “until FMCSA identifies OSA as the cause of a not-insignificant number of crashes.”

Other organizations spoke out in favor of screening.

“It is astounding that airline pilots, whose planes fly themselves a great deal of the time a flight is in the air, are required to be screened for sleep apnea, yet truck drivers, who need to pay attention every second they are on the road, are not,” Road Safe America Co-Founder Steve Owings wrote.

Beth Badger, of Columbus, GA, wrote about how her father died when a truck driver fell asleep behind the wheel and slammed into the back of her father’s vehicle, which had slowed because of a crash ahead.

“Emergency [personnel], who were working the prior crash, were running for safety because they recognized that the semi would be unable to stop,” Badger wrote. “The emergency [personnel] already on site could not save my dad. He died of blunt force trauma, belted in his crushed car.

“I don’t know why the semi driver was sleeping. But to those of you complaining about the cost, I would like to know what you would be willing to pay to save a loved one’s life. I thank the FMCSA for looking into this matter. Many comments made sense [about being sensible] about this issue. But to just complain about the cost is short-sighted and painful.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)