Federal agencies Bus/limo/taxi Trucking Transportation

FMCSA withdraws proposed rule on safety fitness determinations


Photo: WendellandCarolyn/iStockphoto

Washington – The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration on March 23 withdrew a proposed rule that would have changed the safety fitness determination process for commercial motor vehicle carriers.

The decision ends FMCSA’s pursuit of new methodology to determine whether motor carriers are fit to operate based on on-road safety data, information from investigations or a combination of the two sources.

In addition to doing away with the proposed rule, the agency stated that it is canceling plans to publish a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking about safety fitness determinations. FMCSA is awaiting a final report – expected in June – on the issue from the National Academies of Science.

“If FMCSA determines changes to the safety fitness determination process are still necessary and advisable in the future, a new rulemaking would be initiated that will incorporate any appropriate recommendations from the National Academies of Science and the comments received through this rulemaking,” states a notice published in the March 23 Federal Register. “The NPRM concerning motor carrier safety fitness determinations is withdrawn.”

The Arlington, VA-based American Trucking Associations praised FMCSA’s decision to drop the proposal.

“ATA has long supported using data to target enforcement activities against bad actors in our industry,” ATA President and CEO Chris Spear said in a press release. “However, numerous reviews have shown flaws in the data and in the [Compliance, Safety, Accountability] system, so it makes sense to withdraw this rule which would have used CSA data to create publicly available fitness ratings.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)