NSC Construction and Utilities Division news NSC Labor Division news Research/studies Hazard communication Injury prevention Construction

How can the job hazard analysis process be more effective? CPWR explores

Reprints
construction-site1.jpg
Photo: kali9/iStockphoto

Silver Spring, MD — Complacency, ineffective communication from management, lack of input and buy-in from workers, and isolation of upper management from jobs are some of the common issues that make the job hazard analysis process ineffective, according to a recent case study from CPWR – The Center for Construction Research and Training.

Researchers from CWPR analyzed 30 sample JHA documents and conducted 23 “semi-structured” interviews with safety professionals from 17 construction companies. Findings show that most of the documents don’t have instructions for conducting a JHA. They also lack a risk assessment matrix, visual representations or reference information for control recommendations.

Despite the disadvantages to using paper forms, around half of the safety pros said they still use them over electronic forms. The practice was most common among smaller contractors.

 

CPWR advises “active coordination” among all parties and frequently updating information based on site conditions to keep JHA content current. The center also encourages rotating JHA leaders to empower employees and improve buy-in from construction crews. Additionally, use mini-JHA cards or one-page summaries to make content more accessible to employees as well as visual aids to make content easier to understand.

The study was published online Jan. 23 in the International Journal of Construction Education and Research.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)