On Safety

The On Safety blog has moved.

OSHA Roundup for April 18, 2016

April 18, 2016


Following a new Government Accountability Office report highlighting the prevalence of violence in the health care field, congressional Democrats push OSHA for a standard that would address the issue.

Notable proposed fines

$280,000 to a Georgia roofing contractor for fall and eye protection violations at Florida worksites

$172,700 to a manufacturer of heat transfer, separation and fluid handling technologies in Houston for a variety of hazards, including struck-bys and amputations

$121,880 to a Michigan painting contractor for allegedly exposing employers to lead at a Pennsylvania worksite

$112,700 to a medical technology employer for guarding violations that resulted in amputations of two workers’ fingers at a Nebraska facility

$107,620 to a discount chain store in Mississippi for alleged blocked exits and failure to inspect fire extinguishers

$50,400 to a Texas humanitarian relief company for lockout/tagout and machine guarding violations following a feed auger amputating a worker’s hand while cleaning the machine

Review Counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of April 18:

# of Days OSHA Proposal
196 Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

The opinions expressed in "On Safety" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)